This post is another announcement by Sam Berg, this time in response to the rumours and slanders circulating around the blogosphere regarding her statement on William and Mary. I’m leaving the comments on for the time being, but the minute I receive abuse or other forms of stupidity they will be turned off. Rule number one: read The Rules before you comment.
There are a lot of lies being told about me right now. I’m used to that because it comes with the pro-woman activism that kooky kid called life dropped into my lap like an unexploded bomb, but it’s rather concentrated at the moment. Most of it is nonsense, like that I’m trying to get the pro-sex work group kicked off campus (I’m not) or that I’m afraid to debate sex workers (I’m not) or that I said RenEv made threats personally to me (she didn’t and I didn’t say she did), but there is one very serious bit of business tucked into the ever-heaping distortions that I feel must be addressed.
Renegade Evolution is saying that I sent her threatening private emails. I have never emailed RenEv. Not once. What would be the point?
So where did the supposed emailed “threat” come from? I think I know, and I think you’re all going to want to learn what I know, because the pieces are fitting together for me very clearly for the first time.
Remember that person who committed fraud by lying to one of Genderberg’s moderators about being anti-pornography and anti-prostitution so they could spy on our private forums and then release words from there publicly? If you need or want a recap about the violation of women’s safe space that happened one year ago today in April 2007 you can read this:
http://msjared.blogspot.com/2007/05/per … ample.html
Caught up? Good.
Also in April 2007, the aforementioned lying person started a hate blog called “Radical Feminist Terrorism” where the person who stole private writings from GB spewed her vituperative guts out with such psychotic absurdities as:
“You can’t really understand the hatred that is embodied in many of the posts on Genderberg. Many members of that forum simply do not see other women as human at all.““I am not sure why the belief that women should be free to live as they wish is so dangerous. I do know that to many in the Genderberg this belief in women’s freedom is utterly inexcusable. They will do anything to destroy it.”
“While many will claim that Genderberg is a “safe space” my belief is that there should be no safe space for those who work to destroy women. There should be no dark corner where ANYONE can get together and plot against or foster hatred of women.”
“There is no evil that these haters of women will not stoop to. There is no vile act of malice they cannot justify. They will do anything in their power to destroy or silence anyone they disagree with. In their hate they are trying to destroy her. In their blood lust for a purge they are trying to force Renegade Evolution to reveal who I am. They want to close the hole so they can go back to plotting against women in the dark.”
“In my time on Genderberg I read more hatred of women than I ever read or saw in pornography.”
Seeing how loony the anonymous Radfem Terrorism blogger clearly is, I brushed off replying substantively because the raging dementia speaks for itself.
Throughout May and June the moderators at Genderberg worked like demons to try and figure out which of the 100 or so members was the leak. We ask every member a series of questions before approving them and we were going member by member to try and restore some of the lost sense of security that made one prostituted woman feel she had to leave GB. By early July we pooled our research and figured out that the leak was someone who registered as “Miriam” with a bunch of hooey about being anti-pornography and caring about prostituted women. I deleted “Miriam” from the memberlist and sent her the following email on July 5, 2007:
“I feel bad for you because you’ve obviously been seriously fucked up by people in your life, but if you don’t back off slagging on radfems you’re going to force my hand.I can prove you committed fraud when you lied to moderator deedle about your gb membership, and I can prove you were the one who leaked Pony’s words. Because you’re a pathological liar, you’re probably thinking you can lie your way out of this just like you’ve done other times.
You can’t.
I didn’t out you before because I have a soft spot for seriously fucked up women like yourself, but I’m not above initiating legal action to show the ex-sex workers in my little community that their privacy and continued peace of mind is something I take very seriously. If you cared about sex workers one tenth as much as you manipulatively tell people you do then you would not have violated a sex worker-heavy community like you did.
Stop telling lies, Miriam. You’re not as good at it as you think you are.”
Miriam was the name RE used to post under at Biting Beavers. I remember her saying how the rapes of two porn performers reflected on them as performers (no criticism of the industry or the sadistic men doing the raping of course). Good times.
You should have titled this post “Busted” Laurelin. Spying in private forums where you aren’t welcome because you are in political opposition to them is such an ethical way to behave.
I bet the pro-pornsters don’t have any problem in her lying to get into and then spying at Genderberg either, stand-up defenders of morality that they are.
Comment by delphyne — April 23, 2008 @ 1:18 pm
She said that? I never saw that. That’s vile. Oh my god…
Comment by Laurelin — April 23, 2008 @ 1:27 pm
And you’re right, ‘Busted’ would have been a much better title. Alas, I am not known for short and snappy!
Comment by Laurelin — April 23, 2008 @ 1:34 pm
‘Busted’, cool! And thanks for posting this Laurelin.
Comment by Maggie Hays — April 23, 2008 @ 2:14 pm
OK I’ve got to say that RE’s defense is pretty funny. She’s claiming she wasn’t the spy – Soulhuntre got the info her. As if someone else doing your dirty work for you is any better than actually doing it yourself.
Comment by delphyne — April 23, 2008 @ 2:42 pm
I should just add, that doesn’t mean I believe her. Why on earth is RE claiming Sam threatened her when Sam e-mailed someone called Miriam (who RE claims not to be) who then supposedly passed on her e-mail to [another person] who then supposedly passed on the e-mail to RE (RE quoted from it in one of her posts before she realised she’d made a boo-boo and took it down) and at that point RE decided that an e-mail that wasn’t even sent to her meant her. If RE isn’t Miriam as she claims, then why does she think Sam’s threat to pursue legal action against the spy at Genderberg was aimed at her? It makes no sense, but then sense isn’t required in pro-pornster land, just a commitment to keep up the bullying and attacks.
And as RE claims not to be the spy now but that Soulhuntre and one of the women he’s persuaded to submit to him are (which is strange because I asked RE directly last year who the spy was and she said she had no idea, another fib) why didn’t she just pass Sam’s e-mail on to him? I mean if something isn’t directed at you why pretend it is?
Questions, questions.
Comment by delphyne — April 23, 2008 @ 3:52 pm
‘Renegade Evolution’ was the only person on that panel at the debate using a ’superhero’ name. She likes her anonymity. You would think that people who place such importance on their own anonymity would extend this this consideration to others? Not so, apparently.
Comment by Arantxa — April 23, 2008 @ 6:22 pm
I know, none this actually makes sense.
This is all very dodge.
And why the hell would soulhuntre have a friend who was a member of Genderberg anyway? soulhuntre is basically the epitome of all we despise and stand against! I’ve seen his site, he’s a vile piece of shit, and I simply do not accept that he was able to be all happy friendly with a member of Genderberg who was there because s/he believed in what we stood for. Disagreement, sure, one expects that, but how to be all matey with someone whose point of view is the polar opposite to yours, and who abuses so repulsively those who dissent from their reactionary misogynist bullshit?
I was given superhero names by colleagues here at Uni X: She Who Kicks Most Arse, ‘The Dangerous One’. Hmmmm. Today I just feel like The Knackered Pessimistic One.
Comment by Laurelin — April 24, 2008 @ 6:28 pm
too many swearwords… gah… must wash out own mouth with chocolate…. and learn grammar
Comment by Laurelin — April 24, 2008 @ 6:33 pm
Hi Laurelin
Do you happen to know where I can find a podcast of the debate panel? I have been wanting to hear it myself. Thanks!
Comment by Lara — April 24, 2008 @ 6:41 pm
Hi Lara,
I’m afraid I really don’t know. Perhaps one of the sex pos blogs has a link to it? Or I guess one could try and find the website for William and Mary itself?
Comment by Laurelin — April 25, 2008 @ 1:41 am
delphyne said: Questions, questions.
I prefer not to worry about answering them. It will only drive one crazy to untangle all the layers of lying and inconsistency. File it all under ‘waste of time’ and move on
Comment by stormy — April 26, 2008 @ 12:08 pm
That’s the thing about attention seekers – they love being the centre of attention! So they’ll be obnoxious and/or they’ll lie and scheme and cook up the most outrageous parsonae in order that people will notice them.
And some people do notice them – and keep hanging on to their every word. That’s what keeps them going – it’s almost as though that’s what keeps them alive.
It’s all meaningless, of course.
It’s pathalogical and really quite sad
Comment by witchy-woo — April 27, 2008 @ 4:20 am